Creationist I.D.I.O.T.S. Take a Licking...From a Dog!
by Walid
Unconfirmed sources report a major set back for the Discovery Institute and it's fight to reintroduce the creation myth back into American schools. In a show trial staged for the benefit of the Ohio school super intendments association, the newly repackaged creation myth marketed as 'Intelligent Design' was shattered during opening arguments by the introduction of crucial evidence never before seen in public.

The Discovery Institute, a right wing evangelical Christian think tank, better know for it's financial backing of the Flat Earth Society, has been supporting a cause they call 'Intelligent Design'. Masquerading as a scientific alternative to Darwin's Theory of Evolution "Intelligent Design" states that the biology of life as we know it is too complicated to have evolved over the Earths billion year history. "The system is so perfect and complicated that only the Lord God could have created such an 'Intelligent Design'" stated the institute's Stephen Meyer.

As arguments raged in Ohio The Discovery Institute dispatched its "Intelligent Design Information Outreach Technical Staff"(I.D.I.O.T.S.) to Ohio to battle against Biologists from Case Western University and the Theory of Evolution. Professor Ken Miller, Of Case Western remarked, "The Discovery Institute is looking to turn back the clock and dissolve the barriers between Church and Science." Another Biologist related to the case suggested these I.D.I.O.T.S. should just go back to Sunday school and leave science in hands of adults."

The Ohio case began with the I.D.I.O.T.S. claim that the biology of life and nature is perfection and complexity beyond the imagination. "A higher power must be involved to create such perfection. The biological system must be the creation of a super Intelligence." Bruce Chapman the leader of I.D.I.O.T.S went on explain. "Only god could create a system with such purpose and grace."

The Defense opened their case with great confidence. "These are compelling arguments if reviewed in the absence scientific inquiry." Replied Professor Ken Miller. Miller went on to introduce two key pieces if evidence that destroyed the theory of 'Intelligent Design' once and for all.

The first item presented was (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) or more commonly known as the platypus. Miller said, "I ask the court. In what so called 'Intelligent Design' would a duck billed mammal with webbed feet lay Eggs?"

Professor Miller went on to introduce his own pet, a common domesticated dog. The dog, named Paley, promptly defecated on the court floor them proceeded to lick its testacies. "This animal is living proof that an 'Intelligent Design' does not exist!" The courtroom erupted.

Once order was restored the presiding judge his Honor Tom Scopes declared the arguments complete and made the following statement. "I'm a open minded man but I just can't believe that dog ball licking could be any part of the Lord Gods 'Intelligent Design.' Case closed!"

 
Rate This Item
 
I Liked It
 
Print
8410 Views
 
Unconfirmed Sources political satire and news story parodies as represented above are written as satire or parody. They are, of course, fictitious.

Your Comments



DaveLoneRanger wrote:
Your post (heavily laden with liberal, anti-Christian propaganda) makes the same mistake that Science magazine made in calling the Disovery Institute a right-wing creationist thinktank.

They corrected themselves:
http://www.evolutionnews.or...

Will you? Or will you be so myopic as to assume one group is the same as the other simply because they have a common enemey?Da
_______________________________


The Editor wrote:
Dave,
You are right, Disovery Institute is not an right-wing creationist thinktank.

I respectufully offer the following correction.

We at Unconfirmed sources believe the Discovery Institute is a radical right-wing fringe group using dishonest methods to further a patently unscientific freak show of a version of the creation myth.

Happy?
_______________________________


mike wrote:
what the hell is wrong with god creating evolution. Is god not great enough to be responsible for the big bang? I believe there is a power that is in all the universe, from the farthest star to the smallest quark but to put all of that into a little box and try to explain it with ancient bible stories is an affront to god. MY god is much bigger than that
_______________________________


mike wrote:
what the hell is wrong with god creating evolution. Is god not great enough to be responsible for the big bang? I believe there is a power that is in all the universe, from the farthest star to the smallest quark but to put all of that into a little box and try to explain it with ancient bible stories is an affront to god. MY god is much bigger than that
_______________________________


j.c. wrote:
creationists are pathetic
_______________________________

Add Your Comments

This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it

Comments must be approved before being published.

 

In case You Missed Them...

"I got me a Democrate." Democratic Lawmaker Indicted

George W. Bush wants to Know......

APE exclusive photo of Camel Spider Man apparently clinging to the side of a Manhattan skyscraper. Camel Spider Man Terrorizes New Yorkers

 

Recently in the News